Review



human u2os dr gfp cells  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    ATCC human u2os dr gfp cells
    The loss of TARG1 sensitizes cells to topoisomerase II and ATR inhibition and induces homologous recombination defects (A–D) Representative images (left) and quantification (right) of colony-formation assays with <t>U2OS</t> WT and TARG1-KO cells treated with DMSO or as indicated. (E) Schematic representation of the DR-GFP HR reporter assay, as described. The SceGFP gene is a GFP gene mutated to contain a recognition site for the I- Sce I endonuclease and two in-frame stop codons. The iGFP gene is a truncated internal WT GFP fragment. Following I-Sce I expression, SceGFP is cleaved, yielding a DSB. A functional GFP gene is restored upon repair via HR using iGFP as a donor sequence. (F) U2OS DR-GFP cells were transfected with non-targeting siRNA control (siCTRL), two different siTARG1, or siCtIP and 24 h later were cotransfected with I-SceI and mCherry for 48 h prior to analysis by flow cytometry. The proportion of GFP-positive cells among the mCherry-positive population was used as a readout for I-SceI-induced HR events. CtIP knockdown acts as a positive control here. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3 (A–D), or mean ± SEM, n = 3 (F); ns, not significant, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also <xref ref-type=Figure S1 . " width="250" height="auto" />
    Human U2os Dr Gfp Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 60 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human u2os dr gfp cells/product/ATCC
    Average 94 stars, based on 60 article reviews
    human u2os dr gfp cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "The interplay of TARG1 and PARG protects against genomic instability"

    Article Title: The interplay of TARG1 and PARG protects against genomic instability

    Journal: Cell Reports

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113113

    The loss of TARG1 sensitizes cells to topoisomerase II and ATR inhibition and induces homologous recombination defects (A–D) Representative images (left) and quantification (right) of colony-formation assays with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells treated with DMSO or as indicated. (E) Schematic representation of the DR-GFP HR reporter assay, as described. The SceGFP gene is a GFP gene mutated to contain a recognition site for the I- Sce I endonuclease and two in-frame stop codons. The iGFP gene is a truncated internal WT GFP fragment. Following I-Sce I expression, SceGFP is cleaved, yielding a DSB. A functional GFP gene is restored upon repair via HR using iGFP as a donor sequence. (F) U2OS DR-GFP cells were transfected with non-targeting siRNA control (siCTRL), two different siTARG1, or siCtIP and 24 h later were cotransfected with I-SceI and mCherry for 48 h prior to analysis by flow cytometry. The proportion of GFP-positive cells among the mCherry-positive population was used as a readout for I-SceI-induced HR events. CtIP knockdown acts as a positive control here. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3 (A–D), or mean ± SEM, n = 3 (F); ns, not significant, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also <xref ref-type=Figure S1 . " title="... (left) and quantification (right) of colony-formation assays with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells treated with DMSO or ..." property="contentUrl" width="100%" height="100%"/>
    Figure Legend Snippet: The loss of TARG1 sensitizes cells to topoisomerase II and ATR inhibition and induces homologous recombination defects (A–D) Representative images (left) and quantification (right) of colony-formation assays with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells treated with DMSO or as indicated. (E) Schematic representation of the DR-GFP HR reporter assay, as described. The SceGFP gene is a GFP gene mutated to contain a recognition site for the I- Sce I endonuclease and two in-frame stop codons. The iGFP gene is a truncated internal WT GFP fragment. Following I-Sce I expression, SceGFP is cleaved, yielding a DSB. A functional GFP gene is restored upon repair via HR using iGFP as a donor sequence. (F) U2OS DR-GFP cells were transfected with non-targeting siRNA control (siCTRL), two different siTARG1, or siCtIP and 24 h later were cotransfected with I-SceI and mCherry for 48 h prior to analysis by flow cytometry. The proportion of GFP-positive cells among the mCherry-positive population was used as a readout for I-SceI-induced HR events. CtIP knockdown acts as a positive control here. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3 (A–D), or mean ± SEM, n = 3 (F); ns, not significant, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also Figure S1 .

    Techniques Used: Inhibition, Homologous Recombination, Reporter Assay, Expressing, Functional Assay, Sequencing, Transfection, Control, Flow Cytometry, Knockdown, Positive Control, Two Tailed Test

    TARG1 deficiency is synthetically lethal with PARG suppression in a PARP1-dependent manner (A–D) Representative images (top) and quantification (bottom) of colony-formation assays with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells (A, C, and D), PEO1 WT and TARG1-KO cells (B), and U2OS TARG1-KO cells complemented with TARG1 WT or catalytically inactive K84A mutant (D) treated with DMSO or as indicated. (C) P1i, PARP1 inhibitor; P2i, PARP2 inhibitor. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also <xref ref-type=Figure S2 . " title="... (top) and quantification (bottom) of colony-formation assays with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells (A, C, and D), ..." property="contentUrl" width="100%" height="100%"/>
    Figure Legend Snippet: TARG1 deficiency is synthetically lethal with PARG suppression in a PARP1-dependent manner (A–D) Representative images (top) and quantification (bottom) of colony-formation assays with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells (A, C, and D), PEO1 WT and TARG1-KO cells (B), and U2OS TARG1-KO cells complemented with TARG1 WT or catalytically inactive K84A mutant (D) treated with DMSO or as indicated. (C) P1i, PARP1 inhibitor; P2i, PARP2 inhibitor. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also Figure S2 .

    Techniques Used: Mutagenesis, Two Tailed Test

    The joint loss of TARG1 and PARG activity leads to excessive ADPr and induces replication stress (A) U2OS cells were treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib, and 10 μM PARGi for 6 days. ADPr and DNA damage marker levels were analyzed using western blotting. (B) Representative images of ADPr staining in detergent pre-extracted cells treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi, or 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib for 4 days. Scale bars, 10 μm. A representative image from n = 3 is shown. (C) Quantification of (B). Each point represents the mean ADPr intensity of an individual nucleus. The black line represents the mean ADPr intensity of each condition; at least 220 cells were analyzed per condition. (D) Representative images of RPA32 p-T21 and γH2AX staining in cells treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi, 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib, or 0.1 μM veliparib for 4 days. Scale bars, 10 μm. A representative image from n = 3 is shown. (E and F) Quantification of (D). Each point represents the percentage of cells with >5 RPA32 p-T21 foci per image (E) or the percentage of cells with >10 γH2AX foci per image (F). The black line represents the mean percentage of cells per image with >5 RPA32 p-T21 (E) or >10 γH2AX (F) foci for each condition. ∼250 images and a total of ∼20,000 cells were analyzed per condition. (G) Quantification of γH2AX-positive cells by flow cytometry after 5 days of exposure to DMSO or indicated treatment. (H) U2OS cells were treated with DMSO or 10 μM PARGi for 4 days. ADPr and DNA damage marker levels were analyzed using western blotting. (I) Quantification of cell-cycle analysis by flow cytometry of EdU- and DAPI-stained U2OS cells after 5 days of exposure to DMSO or indicated treatment and 1 h EdU pulse. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of four independent experiments (G and I). ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also <xref ref-type=Figure S3 . " title="... to excessive ADPr and induces replication stress (A) U2OS cells were treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi ..." property="contentUrl" width="100%" height="100%"/>
    Figure Legend Snippet: The joint loss of TARG1 and PARG activity leads to excessive ADPr and induces replication stress (A) U2OS cells were treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib, and 10 μM PARGi for 6 days. ADPr and DNA damage marker levels were analyzed using western blotting. (B) Representative images of ADPr staining in detergent pre-extracted cells treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi, or 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib for 4 days. Scale bars, 10 μm. A representative image from n = 3 is shown. (C) Quantification of (B). Each point represents the mean ADPr intensity of an individual nucleus. The black line represents the mean ADPr intensity of each condition; at least 220 cells were analyzed per condition. (D) Representative images of RPA32 p-T21 and γH2AX staining in cells treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi, 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib, or 0.1 μM veliparib for 4 days. Scale bars, 10 μm. A representative image from n = 3 is shown. (E and F) Quantification of (D). Each point represents the percentage of cells with >5 RPA32 p-T21 foci per image (E) or the percentage of cells with >10 γH2AX foci per image (F). The black line represents the mean percentage of cells per image with >5 RPA32 p-T21 (E) or >10 γH2AX (F) foci for each condition. ∼250 images and a total of ∼20,000 cells were analyzed per condition. (G) Quantification of γH2AX-positive cells by flow cytometry after 5 days of exposure to DMSO or indicated treatment. (H) U2OS cells were treated with DMSO or 10 μM PARGi for 4 days. ADPr and DNA damage marker levels were analyzed using western blotting. (I) Quantification of cell-cycle analysis by flow cytometry of EdU- and DAPI-stained U2OS cells after 5 days of exposure to DMSO or indicated treatment and 1 h EdU pulse. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of four independent experiments (G and I). ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also Figure S3 .

    Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Marker, Western Blot, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Cell Cycle Assay, Two Tailed Test

    TARG1 and HPF1 both protect cells from toxic PARP1-mediated ADPr (A) Quantification of colony-formation assay with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells transfected with siCTRL or siHPF1 and treated with DMSO or as indicated. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3; ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). (B) U2OS cells transfected with siCTRL or siHPF1 were treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi, or 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib for 4 days. ADPr and DNA damage marker levels were analyzed using western blotting.
    Figure Legend Snippet: TARG1 and HPF1 both protect cells from toxic PARP1-mediated ADPr (A) Quantification of colony-formation assay with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells transfected with siCTRL or siHPF1 and treated with DMSO or as indicated. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3; ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). (B) U2OS cells transfected with siCTRL or siHPF1 were treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi, or 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib for 4 days. ADPr and DNA damage marker levels were analyzed using western blotting.

    Techniques Used: Colony Assay, Transfection, Two Tailed Test, Marker, Western Blot


    Figure Legend Snippet:

    Techniques Used: Recombinant, Transfection, Protease Inhibitor, Mutagenesis, Flow Cytometry, Negative Control, Plasmid Preparation, Software



    Similar Products

    94
    ATCC human u2os dr gfp cells
    The loss of TARG1 sensitizes cells to topoisomerase II and ATR inhibition and induces homologous recombination defects (A–D) Representative images (left) and quantification (right) of colony-formation assays with <t>U2OS</t> WT and TARG1-KO cells treated with DMSO or as indicated. (E) Schematic representation of the DR-GFP HR reporter assay, as described. The SceGFP gene is a GFP gene mutated to contain a recognition site for the I- Sce I endonuclease and two in-frame stop codons. The iGFP gene is a truncated internal WT GFP fragment. Following I-Sce I expression, SceGFP is cleaved, yielding a DSB. A functional GFP gene is restored upon repair via HR using iGFP as a donor sequence. (F) U2OS DR-GFP cells were transfected with non-targeting siRNA control (siCTRL), two different siTARG1, or siCtIP and 24 h later were cotransfected with I-SceI and mCherry for 48 h prior to analysis by flow cytometry. The proportion of GFP-positive cells among the mCherry-positive population was used as a readout for I-SceI-induced HR events. CtIP knockdown acts as a positive control here. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3 (A–D), or mean ± SEM, n = 3 (F); ns, not significant, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also <xref ref-type=Figure S1 . " width="250" height="auto" />
    Human U2os Dr Gfp Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human u2os dr gfp cells/product/ATCC
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human u2os dr gfp cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The loss of TARG1 sensitizes cells to topoisomerase II and ATR inhibition and induces homologous recombination defects (A–D) Representative images (left) and quantification (right) of colony-formation assays with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells treated with DMSO or as indicated. (E) Schematic representation of the DR-GFP HR reporter assay, as described. The SceGFP gene is a GFP gene mutated to contain a recognition site for the I- Sce I endonuclease and two in-frame stop codons. The iGFP gene is a truncated internal WT GFP fragment. Following I-Sce I expression, SceGFP is cleaved, yielding a DSB. A functional GFP gene is restored upon repair via HR using iGFP as a donor sequence. (F) U2OS DR-GFP cells were transfected with non-targeting siRNA control (siCTRL), two different siTARG1, or siCtIP and 24 h later were cotransfected with I-SceI and mCherry for 48 h prior to analysis by flow cytometry. The proportion of GFP-positive cells among the mCherry-positive population was used as a readout for I-SceI-induced HR events. CtIP knockdown acts as a positive control here. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3 (A–D), or mean ± SEM, n = 3 (F); ns, not significant, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also <xref ref-type=Figure S1 . " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: Cell Reports

    Article Title: The interplay of TARG1 and PARG protects against genomic instability

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113113

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The loss of TARG1 sensitizes cells to topoisomerase II and ATR inhibition and induces homologous recombination defects (A–D) Representative images (left) and quantification (right) of colony-formation assays with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells treated with DMSO or as indicated. (E) Schematic representation of the DR-GFP HR reporter assay, as described. The SceGFP gene is a GFP gene mutated to contain a recognition site for the I- Sce I endonuclease and two in-frame stop codons. The iGFP gene is a truncated internal WT GFP fragment. Following I-Sce I expression, SceGFP is cleaved, yielding a DSB. A functional GFP gene is restored upon repair via HR using iGFP as a donor sequence. (F) U2OS DR-GFP cells were transfected with non-targeting siRNA control (siCTRL), two different siTARG1, or siCtIP and 24 h later were cotransfected with I-SceI and mCherry for 48 h prior to analysis by flow cytometry. The proportion of GFP-positive cells among the mCherry-positive population was used as a readout for I-SceI-induced HR events. CtIP knockdown acts as a positive control here. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3 (A–D), or mean ± SEM, n = 3 (F); ns, not significant, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also Figure S1 .

    Article Snippet: Human: U2OS DR-GFP cells , ATCC , Cat# CRL-3455.

    Techniques: Inhibition, Homologous Recombination, Reporter Assay, Expressing, Functional Assay, Sequencing, Transfection, Control, Flow Cytometry, Knockdown, Positive Control, Two Tailed Test

    TARG1 deficiency is synthetically lethal with PARG suppression in a PARP1-dependent manner (A–D) Representative images (top) and quantification (bottom) of colony-formation assays with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells (A, C, and D), PEO1 WT and TARG1-KO cells (B), and U2OS TARG1-KO cells complemented with TARG1 WT or catalytically inactive K84A mutant (D) treated with DMSO or as indicated. (C) P1i, PARP1 inhibitor; P2i, PARP2 inhibitor. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also <xref ref-type=Figure S2 . " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: Cell Reports

    Article Title: The interplay of TARG1 and PARG protects against genomic instability

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113113

    Figure Lengend Snippet: TARG1 deficiency is synthetically lethal with PARG suppression in a PARP1-dependent manner (A–D) Representative images (top) and quantification (bottom) of colony-formation assays with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells (A, C, and D), PEO1 WT and TARG1-KO cells (B), and U2OS TARG1-KO cells complemented with TARG1 WT or catalytically inactive K84A mutant (D) treated with DMSO or as indicated. (C) P1i, PARP1 inhibitor; P2i, PARP2 inhibitor. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also Figure S2 .

    Article Snippet: Human: U2OS DR-GFP cells , ATCC , Cat# CRL-3455.

    Techniques: Mutagenesis, Two Tailed Test

    The joint loss of TARG1 and PARG activity leads to excessive ADPr and induces replication stress (A) U2OS cells were treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib, and 10 μM PARGi for 6 days. ADPr and DNA damage marker levels were analyzed using western blotting. (B) Representative images of ADPr staining in detergent pre-extracted cells treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi, or 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib for 4 days. Scale bars, 10 μm. A representative image from n = 3 is shown. (C) Quantification of (B). Each point represents the mean ADPr intensity of an individual nucleus. The black line represents the mean ADPr intensity of each condition; at least 220 cells were analyzed per condition. (D) Representative images of RPA32 p-T21 and γH2AX staining in cells treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi, 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib, or 0.1 μM veliparib for 4 days. Scale bars, 10 μm. A representative image from n = 3 is shown. (E and F) Quantification of (D). Each point represents the percentage of cells with >5 RPA32 p-T21 foci per image (E) or the percentage of cells with >10 γH2AX foci per image (F). The black line represents the mean percentage of cells per image with >5 RPA32 p-T21 (E) or >10 γH2AX (F) foci for each condition. ∼250 images and a total of ∼20,000 cells were analyzed per condition. (G) Quantification of γH2AX-positive cells by flow cytometry after 5 days of exposure to DMSO or indicated treatment. (H) U2OS cells were treated with DMSO or 10 μM PARGi for 4 days. ADPr and DNA damage marker levels were analyzed using western blotting. (I) Quantification of cell-cycle analysis by flow cytometry of EdU- and DAPI-stained U2OS cells after 5 days of exposure to DMSO or indicated treatment and 1 h EdU pulse. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of four independent experiments (G and I). ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also <xref ref-type=Figure S3 . " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: Cell Reports

    Article Title: The interplay of TARG1 and PARG protects against genomic instability

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113113

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The joint loss of TARG1 and PARG activity leads to excessive ADPr and induces replication stress (A) U2OS cells were treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib, and 10 μM PARGi for 6 days. ADPr and DNA damage marker levels were analyzed using western blotting. (B) Representative images of ADPr staining in detergent pre-extracted cells treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi, or 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib for 4 days. Scale bars, 10 μm. A representative image from n = 3 is shown. (C) Quantification of (B). Each point represents the mean ADPr intensity of an individual nucleus. The black line represents the mean ADPr intensity of each condition; at least 220 cells were analyzed per condition. (D) Representative images of RPA32 p-T21 and γH2AX staining in cells treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi, 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib, or 0.1 μM veliparib for 4 days. Scale bars, 10 μm. A representative image from n = 3 is shown. (E and F) Quantification of (D). Each point represents the percentage of cells with >5 RPA32 p-T21 foci per image (E) or the percentage of cells with >10 γH2AX foci per image (F). The black line represents the mean percentage of cells per image with >5 RPA32 p-T21 (E) or >10 γH2AX (F) foci for each condition. ∼250 images and a total of ∼20,000 cells were analyzed per condition. (G) Quantification of γH2AX-positive cells by flow cytometry after 5 days of exposure to DMSO or indicated treatment. (H) U2OS cells were treated with DMSO or 10 μM PARGi for 4 days. ADPr and DNA damage marker levels were analyzed using western blotting. (I) Quantification of cell-cycle analysis by flow cytometry of EdU- and DAPI-stained U2OS cells after 5 days of exposure to DMSO or indicated treatment and 1 h EdU pulse. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of four independent experiments (G and I). ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). See also Figure S3 .

    Article Snippet: Human: U2OS DR-GFP cells , ATCC , Cat# CRL-3455.

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Marker, Western Blot, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Cell Cycle Assay, Two Tailed Test

    TARG1 and HPF1 both protect cells from toxic PARP1-mediated ADPr (A) Quantification of colony-formation assay with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells transfected with siCTRL or siHPF1 and treated with DMSO or as indicated. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3; ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). (B) U2OS cells transfected with siCTRL or siHPF1 were treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi, or 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib for 4 days. ADPr and DNA damage marker levels were analyzed using western blotting.

    Journal: Cell Reports

    Article Title: The interplay of TARG1 and PARG protects against genomic instability

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113113

    Figure Lengend Snippet: TARG1 and HPF1 both protect cells from toxic PARP1-mediated ADPr (A) Quantification of colony-formation assay with U2OS WT and TARG1-KO cells transfected with siCTRL or siHPF1 and treated with DMSO or as indicated. Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3; ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed Student’s t test). (B) U2OS cells transfected with siCTRL or siHPF1 were treated with DMSO, 10 μM PARGi, or 10 μM PARGi and 0.1 μM veliparib for 4 days. ADPr and DNA damage marker levels were analyzed using western blotting.

    Article Snippet: Human: U2OS DR-GFP cells , ATCC , Cat# CRL-3455.

    Techniques: Colony Assay, Transfection, Two Tailed Test, Marker, Western Blot

    Journal: Cell Reports

    Article Title: The interplay of TARG1 and PARG protects against genomic instability

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113113

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Human: U2OS DR-GFP cells , ATCC , Cat# CRL-3455.

    Techniques: Recombinant, Transfection, Protease Inhibitor, Mutagenesis, Flow Cytometry, Negative Control, Plasmid Preparation, Software